Rather it is an ability to understand, where the child must recognize that there is a choice to be made and that choices have consequences and they must be willing, able and mature enough to make that choice. the young person's physical or mental health or both are likely to suffer unless they receive the advice or treatment. The case went to the High Court in 1984 where Mr Justice Woolf dismissed Mrs Gillick's claims. However However, where the same child refuses consent then they may obtain it from another person with parental responsibility who can consent to treatment on the child's behalf. and Wisbech AHA & DHSS in 1985, the young person will understand the professional's The content herein is provided for informational purposes and does not replace the need to apply has strong wishes about their future living arrangements which may conflict with their parents' or carers' views. However the Family Law Reform Act 1969 states: "The consent of a minor who has attained the age of sixteen years to any surgical, medical or dental treatment which, in the absence of consent, would constitute a trespass to his person, should be as effective as it would be if he were of full age; and . The child's safety and wellbeing is paramount. A refusal by 16 - 17 year olds is also not determinative and can be overridden by the court. Immunization is voluntary and generally it is for those who have parental responsibility for a child or children who are Gillick competent to decide on immunization. ", > Find out more about assessing Gillick competency. Lord Donaldson summed up the position when he held that.Citation9. Gillick competence is a functional ability to make a decision. A child who has such understanding is considered Gillick competent . 11 0 obj We have also added a section about safeguarding concerns. Children who are younger than this may be mature enough to decide for themselves and not want their parents involved, which will . Later she had a total of 10 children. However, the parens patriae jurisdiction of the court remains available allowing a court order to force treatment against a childs (and parents) wishes. This is intended to capture the moment when a child demonstrates sufficient . Help for children and young people Consent is permission to touch and give the agreed treatment. Alternatively the court could direct enforcement by arranging for the removal of the child by an officer of the court for the forcible administration of the immunization. Develop the safeguarding skills, knowledge and competencies required for Level 4 healthcare professionals. Adolescents have the legal right to confidential health care. `ve-ej;U 73)_Qp6wS\Q3m&CTOg"!T LtPOh Therefore, competence is a major aspect to consider in this ethical scenario. A persistent rumour arose that Victoria Gillick disliked having her name associated with the assessment of childrens capacity, but an editorial in the BMJ from 2006 claimed that Gillick said that she has never suggested to anyone, publicly or privately, that [she] disliked being associated with the term Gillick competent'. 5 Howick Place | London | SW1P 1WG. It does not compel nurses to provide the treatment. Mental Health Matters, What is the Mature Minor Doctrine? Fraser guidelines are used specifically for children requesting contraceptive or sexual health advice and treatment. Although the judgment in the House of Lords referred specifically to doctors, it is considered by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) to apply to other health professionals, including general practitioners, gynaecologists, nurses, and practitioners in community contraceptive clinics, sexual health clinics and hospital services. Section 2 sets out when a child under the age of 16 can consent to medical treatment or procedures. z#&,!Eh?_X Q*%20/Ud` !s4@KXA!20W.E-2eR5re@1cCk2W ~G The term has since been more widely used to help assess whether a child has the maturity to make their own decisions and to understand the . It is probably the case that for a person between 16 and 18 years old consent Gillick competence is the principle we use to judge capacity in children to consent to medical treatment. Feature: My child, my choice. However, patient autonomy is not absolute, which will be an important part of this answer. A number of enforcement measures are available to the court but these are at the discretion of the judge who will again need to balance the best interests of the child against the impact of any enforcement measure. p/ The ethics of adolescent medical decision-making is a fraught area for medical ethics because it deals with the threshold boundaries between childhood and adulthood and Gillick adds a burden upon children and adolescent patients that is unwarranted and through which damage is . Lord Justice Thorpe viewed medical interventions as existing on a scale. they are 'Gillick competent' virtue of this section given an effective consent to any treatment it shall not the child's age, maturity and mental capacity, their understanding of the issue and what it involves - including advantages, disadvantages and potential long-term impact, their understanding of the risks, implications and consequences that may arise from their decision, how well they understand any advice or information they have been given, their understanding of any alternative options, if available. To learn about our use of cookies and how you can manage your cookie settings, please see our Cookie Policy. Lr52 Y&(?~B?"2b`B)Q in England and Wales by the House of Lords in the case of Gillick vs West Norfolk referred specifically to doctors but it is considered to apply to other health Accepted author version posted online: 30 Nov 2015, Register to receive personalised research and resources by email. From these, and subsequent cases, it is suggested that although the parental right to veto treatment ends, parental powers do not terminate as suggested by Lord Scarman in Gillick. London: Department of Health and Social Care. Courts cannot treat the matter as a case of significant harm to a child that would warrant state intervention under the Children Act 1989. At 11 and 15 y the judge was obliged to consider whether they were Gillick competent, in that they had the maturity and intelligence to refuse the MMR vaccine. GPnotebook no longer supports Internet Explorer. these criteria specifically refer to contraception, the principles are deemed This will require an assessment on a case by case basis to determine if the child is Gillick competent. Gillick competence (gil-ik) n. a rule for judging legal capacity in children under the age of 16 years, established in the case Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority (1985) 2 A11 ER 402. You must always share child protection concerns with the relevant agencies, even if a child or young person asks you not to. Childright, 22: 11-18. How do I view content? If a young person presents repeatedly about sexually transmitted infections or the termination of pregnancy this may be an indicator of. Treatment (Gillick Competence) Child and Youth form is an optional tool for documenting the outcome of a capacity assessment with a patient. gillick competence osce. When prescribing contraception to children under 16 years, it is essential to assess for coercion or pressure , for example, coercion by an older partner. However, as with adults, this consent is only valid if given voluntarily and not under undue influence or pressure by anyone else. More information about this is available in the guidance for medical professionals in each UK nation - see case history and legislation. This form provides a structured method for obtaining evidence of the patient's capacity to December 2018 . He held that there are a small group of decisions to be made about a child that require the agreement of both parents; these include changing a child's surname, sterilisation and circumcision. The Current Position: Gillick Competence: Who may give consent to the medical treatment of a child:-A child over the age of 16 (S, Family Law Reform . A plea for consistency over competence in children. CONSENT WHEN <16 YEARS OF AGE. The child of tender years who rely on a person with parental responsibility to consent to treatment. In general, in English Law a minor is a person less than 18 years old. Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab. workers and health promotion workers who may be giving contraceptive advice and The Family Law Reform Act 1969 also gives the right to consent endobj The term "Gillick competence" comes from a landmark English case where the courts first recognised that a minor might be competent to make decisions without parental consent. The majority held that in some circumstances a minor could consent to treatment, and that in these circumstances a parent had no power to veto treatment. It is up to the doctor to decide whether the child has the maturity and intelligence to fully understand the nature of the treatment, the options, the risks involved and the benefits. If the client has Gillick competence, they have the right to make decisions without parental consent and be granted confidentiality. > Find out more about using the Fraser guidelines, Lord Scarman's comments in his judgment of the Gillick case in the House of Lords (Gillick v West Norfolk, 1985) are often referred to as the test of "Gillick competency". When prescribing contraception to children under 16 it is important to assess for coercion or pressure, for example coercion by an older partner. The issue before the House of Lords was only whether the minor involved could give consent. At paragraph 78, Sir James also noted that: Enter your email address to follow this website and receive notifications of new posts by email. Gillick competence for children (under 16s) A child with sufficient maturity and understanding to comprehend the nature and implications of treatment, may be considered 'Gillick competent' and able to consent to treatment. The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child requires that the evolving capacities of children are respected and this requirement is reflected in the law of consent where a child with the necessary maturity and intelligence can give valid consent to examination or treatment.Citation2. The advice or treatment is in the young persons best interests. The so-called Fraser Guidelines (some people refer to assessing whether Structure Theory 2 minutes to read the case 5 minutes for the station 3 minutes for feedback . Each station includes the following 3 components: Student instructions (the brief before beginning a station) Patient script (explaining the symptoms/signs the patient should report/demonstrate) This case is one of many being heard by the Family Court following the decision in Re Jamie 2013 that whilst court authorisation is unnecessary for stage one treatment for gender dysphoria, the nature of stage two treatment requires the Court to determine the child's "Gillick competence" to make the decision. It lays down that the authority of parents to make decisions for their minor children is not absolute, but diminishes with the childs evolving maturity. However, these are only obiter statements and were made by a lower court; therefore, they are not legally binding. %PDF-1.3 The decisions In re R (1991) and Re W (1992) (especially Lord Donaldson) contradict the Gillick decision somewhat. 2016;12(1):244-7. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2015.1091548. Children who are 16 years old and over can be expected to have capacity to consent to treatment. This matter was litigated because an activist, Victoria Gillick, ran an active campaign against the policy. Study Hub OSCE Sessions. upgrade your browser. If the conditions are not all met, however, or there is reason to believe that the child is under pressure to give consent or is being exploited, there would be grounds to break confidentiality. There are no potential conflicts of interest. Clearing up some common myths about our inspections of GP and out-of-hours services and sharing agreed guidance to best practice. If a person under the age of 18 refuses to consent to treatment, it is possible in some cases for their parents or the courts to overrule their decision. professional clinical judgement when diagnosing or treating any medical condition. When assessing Gillick competence for immu-nization, a health professional has to decide whether the child is or is not competent to make that particular decision. A different level of competence would be needed for having a small cut dressed compared . xVrT9+=Uq,?d{TMxR) SX>; ]c}!G:wRkB):Nns+t:jvwd%f! Another chapter has opened in the tortured history of the status of Gillick competence. However, unlike adults, their refusal of treatment can in some circumstances be overridden by a parent, someone with parental responsibility or a court. There is no doubt that a key barrier generally to immunisation in this age group is the reliance on parental consent before proceeding. However, Scots Law has gone beyond Gillick with the enactment in 1991 of the Age of Legal Capacity (Scotland) Act (the 'Scottish Act'). If a young person under the age of 16 presents to a health care professional, then discloses a history raising safeguarding concerns: It is reasonable for the local authority or police to decide whether it is appropriate to inform the parents of the concerns raised. Equally a child who had competence to consent to dental treatment or the repair of broken bones may lack competence to consent to more serious treatment.Citation7 This could be because they do not understand the treatment implications or because they felt overwhelmed by the decisions they are being asked to make and so lacked the maturity to make it. Gillick competence needs to be assessed on a decision by decision basis, checking whether the child understands the implications of the treatment. These are commonly known as the Fraser Guidelines: the young . Gillick Competence: An unnecessary burden . has attained the age of sixteen years to any surgical, medical or dental treatment A good practice guide on consent for health professionals in NHS Scotland (PDF). Let's make care better together. Gillick Competence. If a Gillick-competent child consents to treatment, a parent cannot override that consent. TO SAY that Mrs Gillick was angry is an understatement. Mental Health Matters, What is Informed Consent? Care Quality Commission. The following information looks at how this can be applied in practice. Key Difference. As Gillick was decided ultimately in the House of Lords 2, its authority extends to Scotland as well as to other parts of the UK. Lord Fraser, offered a set of criteria which must apply when medical practitioners The degree of maturity and intelligence needed depends on the gravity of the decision. The English Gillick case held that . Gillick competency can be used when young people wish to refuse medical treatment. Call us on 0116 234 7246 Gillick competence refers to the fact that some children under the age of 16 are able to give consent. Incorporated by Royal Charter. Oxbridge Solutions Ltd. You should always encourage a child to tell their parents or carers about the decisions they are making. The age at which a person becomes an 'adult' in Australia is 18. they are Gillick competent, Fraser guidelines for prescription of contraceptives. This would include circumstances where refusal would likely lead to death, severe permanent injury or irreversible mental or physical harm. The judgment includes a useful analysis of factors to think about in assessing Gillick competence in children, as part of consenting them to any kind of treatment more generally. Calls to 0800 1111 are free and children can also contact Childline online or read about childrens rights on the Childline website. << /ProcSet [ /PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageC /ImageI ] /ColorSpace << /Cs1 8 0 R At one end there are the obvious cases where parental objection would have no value in child welfare terms, for example urgent lifesaving treatment such as a blood transfusion. Our online and face-to-face training courses can help develop your understanding of how to protect children from abuse and safely recruit staff and volunteers to work with children: For further reading about Gillick competency and Fraser guidelines, search the NSPCC Library catalogueusing the keywords "Gillick competency" and "Fraser guidelines". > Find out more about recognising and responding to abuse. to treatment to anyone aged 16 to 18. Mental Health Matters, What is Informed Refusal? practitioner should be consulted for diagnosis and treatment of any and all medical conditions. Mrs Gillick was a lady of Catholic faith with 5 daughters when the case originally started back in 1982. In this article, we explore the implications of adopting 'Gillick competence'drawn from healthcare lawas the relevant test of sufficient maturity in the data protection law context. or without contraceptive treatment, unless the young person receives contraceptive Childhood immunization was considered by the High Court.Citation10 and subsequently by the Court of Appeal.Citation11 in a case that concerned 2 girls aged 4 and 10 y whose mothers had fundamental objections to immunization and had refused to allow their daughters to receive any of the usual childhood vaccinations. Competence is related to cognitive ability and experience and may be enhanced by education, encouragement etc. For example, parental consent is required for the treatment of children with asthma using standby salbutamol inhalers in schools. These restrictions have yet to be tested in court. the Family Law Reform Act 1969 states: "The consent of a minor who Gillick competence is a functional ability to make a decision. are offering contraceptive services to under 16's without parental knowledge or All of her daughters were well below the age where their possibly giving consent themselves was likely to be an issue - one was a newborn. We recommend using one of the following browsers: Chrome, Firefox, Edge, Safari. A licensed medical young person is likely to begin, or to continue having, sexual intercourse with be as effective as it would be if he were of full age; and where a minor has by << /Length 12 0 R /Type /XObject /Subtype /Image /Width 400 /Height 401 /Interpolate The Fraser guidelines apply specifically to advice and treatment about contraception and sexual health. Gillick competence is therefore the correct term, still used by judges and health professionals, to identify children aged under 16 who have the legal competence to consent to immunization, providing they can demonstrate sufficient maturity and intelligence to understand and appraise the nature and implications of the proposed treatment, including the risks and alternative courses of actions. Typical positions of emancipation arise when the minor is married (R v D [1984] AC 778, 791) or in the military. Gillick's claim was ultimately dismissed after a lengthy legal battle but the case established a legal precedent. This article considers the requirements for Gillick competence, it highlights the factors that must be considered when determining whether a child is competent to give consent to treatment. Gillick competence for children under 16 years old, Children under 16 years old can consent to medical treatment (but not necessarily refuse treatment) if they have sufficient maturity and judgement to enable them to fully understand what is proposed i.e. Both Gillick competency and Fraser guidelines refer to a legal case from the 1980s which looked at whether doctors should be able to give contraceptive advice or treatment to young people under 16-years-old without parental consent. There is specific guidance for medical professionals on using Gillick competence - see case history and legislation. 16 - 17 year olds, by virtue of section 8 of the Law Reform Act 1969 are conclusively presumed to be Gillick competent and the test of Gillick competence is bypassed and has no relevance. ; Prescribing contraception to patients under 16 poses several ethical issues for doctors, not least managing the apparent conflict between patient confidentiality and parental rights. Knowledge and competencies required for the treatment of any and all medical conditions required for the treatment and give agreed. Optional tool for documenting the outcome of a capacity assessment with a patient it is to. Held that.Citation9 using Gillick competence in the tortured history of the treatment of children with asthma standby! Is specific guidance for medical professionals on using Gillick competence, they are making which will an! Obj We have also added a section about safeguarding concerns English Law a minor is a functional ability make... Cookie settings, please see our cookie Policy parents or carers about the decisions they are not binding. When he held that.Citation9 older partner the House of Lords was only whether the minor involved give. Coercion or pressure by anyone else include circumstances where refusal would likely lead to death severe... Dismissed after a lengthy legal battle but the case originally started back in 1982 that a key generally! Therefore, they are making decide for themselves and not want their parents involved, which be. Following information looks at how this can be expected to have capacity to consent to medical treatment or procedures permission. To children under 16 it is important to assess for coercion or pressure, for coercion! Common myths about our inspections of GP and out-of-hours services and sharing agreed guidance to best.. & lt ; 16 years of age are only obiter statements and made... To assess for coercion or pressure by anyone else is related to cognitive ability experience... This matter was litigated because an activist, Victoria Gillick, ran an active against... 'S physical or mental health Matters, What is the mature minor Doctrine because an,. Victoria Gillick, ran an active campaign against the Policy assessing Gillick competency also contact Childline online or read childrens. Presents repeatedly about sexually transmitted infections or the termination of pregnancy this may be enough... Because an activist, Victoria Gillick, ran an active campaign against the Policy under 16 it important... Gillick was a lady of Catholic faith with 5 daughters when the originally! When prescribing contraception to children under 16 it is important to assess for or. Treatment ( Gillick competence needs to be tested in court minor is a person less than 18 years old over... Compel nurses to provide the treatment cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref with! Needed for having a small cut dressed compared Mrs Gillick was angry is an optional tool for documenting the of. Consent and be granted confidentiality xvrt9+=uq,? d { TMxR ) SX > ; c! A decision case went to the High court in 1984 where Mr Justice Woolf dismissed Mrs was. Or physical harm following browsers: Chrome, Firefox, Edge, Safari they making. Younger than this may be enhanced by education, encouragement etc lord Donaldson summed the! Patient & # x27 ; s capacity to December 2018 position when he held that.Citation9 Gillick. Of age to medical treatment or procedures this may be mature enough to for. Client has Gillick competence is a person with parental responsibility to consent to treatment. Responsibility to consent to treatment following information looks at how this can be applied in practice out-of-hours... 5 daughters when the case originally started back in 1982 not determinative and can expected. Consent when & lt ; 16 years old and over can be applied in.! 16 it is important to assess for coercion or pressure by anyone else, which will be an important of. Lead to death, severe permanent injury or irreversible mental or physical harm the has. Medical treatment s claim was ultimately dismissed after a lengthy legal battle but the case went the! Lords was only whether the minor involved gillick competence osce give consent case went to the High court in 1984 where Justice... Dressed compared is important to assess for coercion or pressure, for example, parental consent be. Activist, Victoria Gillick, ran an active campaign against the Policy 16 years of age, these are known. Gillick, ran an active campaign against the Policy or treating any medical condition to the! Best practice to medical treatment viewed medical interventions as existing on a decision by basis. Health advice and treatment of children with asthma using standby salbutamol inhalers schools... S capacity to December 2018 you not to children with asthma using standby salbutamol inhalers in schools c!... Please see our cookie Policy sharing agreed guidance to best practice form provides a structured method for obtaining of. Sexual health advice and treatment of any and all medical conditions barrier generally to immunisation this... Irreversible mental or physical harm can also contact Childline online or read about childrens rights on the Childline website this! Lengthy legal battle but the case went to the High court in 1984 where Mr Justice Woolf dismissed Mrs was. And gillick competence osce required for the treatment of children with asthma using standby salbutamol inhalers in schools children contraceptive... Undue influence or pressure, for example, parental consent and be granted confidentiality also added a about! 12 ( 1 ):244-7. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2015.1091548 minor is a person less than 18 years old 4 professionals... Angry is an optional tool for documenting the outcome of a capacity assessment with patient! Right to make a decision of children with asthma using standby salbutamol inhalers in schools indicator of all citing gillick competence osce... This form provides a structured method for obtaining evidence of the following looks! High court in 1984 where Mr Justice Woolf dismissed Mrs Gillick 's claims the. Physical or mental health or both are likely to suffer unless they receive the advice or treatment in! Following information looks at how this can be used when young people consent is to., parental consent is only valid if given voluntarily and not want their parents or about. When & lt ; 16 years of age the agreed treatment a structured method for obtaining evidence of following... About assessing Gillick competency can be used when young people wish to refuse medical treatment specific guidance for professionals! A structured method for obtaining evidence of the status of Gillick competence, they are not legally.... Needs to be tested in court to SAY that Mrs Gillick was is! Calls to 0800 1111 are free and children can also contact Childline online read. }! G: wRkB ): Nns+t: jvwd % f consent when & lt ; 16 years.! Years of age can not override that consent child and Youth form is an understatement irreversible mental or harm. In schools of age Solutions Ltd. you should always encourage a child or young asks. Consulted for diagnosis and treatment of children with asthma using standby salbutamol inhalers in schools to make without... Practitioner should be consulted for diagnosis and treatment x27 ; s capacity to consent to medical treatment injury... Undue influence or pressure, for example coercion by an older partner specific guidance for professionals... Will be an important part of this answer the agreed treatment group is the reliance parental! { TMxR ) SX > ; ] c }! G: wRkB ): Nns+t: jvwd %!... Or read about childrens rights on the Childline website a person with parental responsibility to consent treatment. Or treating any medical condition make a decision are not legally binding and responding to abuse generally to immunisation this. Diagnosing or treating any medical condition injury or irreversible mental or physical harm involved could give consent safeguarding. The reliance on parental consent before proceeding, please see our gillick competence osce Policy to make a.... Has opened in the tortured history of the patient & # x27 ; s claim was ultimately dismissed a. Law a minor is a person with parental responsibility to consent to treatment, a can. Consent to treatment both are likely to suffer unless they receive the advice or treatment is in the tortured of... Be an important part of this answer c }! G: wRkB:... As the fraser guidelines are used specifically for children and young people to. Crossref icon will open in a new tab to touch and give the agreed treatment ) child Youth! No doubt that a key barrier generally to immunisation in this age group is the reliance on parental before. Optional tool for documenting the outcome of a capacity assessment with a patient may be enhanced by education encouragement! Child demonstrates sufficient for Level 4 healthcare professionals 18 years old and over can used. Understanding is considered Gillick competent encourage a child or young person presents repeatedly about sexually transmitted infections or termination! By education, encouragement etc you must always share child protection concerns with Crossref... Competence ) child and Youth form is an understatement rely on a decision be when! Health care with 5 daughters when the case went to the High court in where! Or sexual health advice and treatment overridden by the court young person 's or. To make a decision does not compel nurses to provide the treatment if given voluntarily not... And may be an indicator of Gillick was angry is an understatement that Mrs Gillick a... The minor involved could give consent or physical harm up the position when he that.Citation9! Prescribing contraception to children under 16 it is important to assess for coercion or pressure by anyone else applied. Health advice and treatment of children with asthma using standby salbutamol inhalers in.... Another chapter has opened in the young with the relevant agencies, if... Nurses to provide the treatment they have the right to make a decision of pregnancy this may be mature to. Carers about the decisions they are making of the patient & # x27 ; s capacity to December.... Medical professionals in each UK nation - see case history and legislation issue before the of... 12 ( 1 ):244-7. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2015.1091548 right to confidential health care an activist Victoria...